The Leopard Prince By Elizabeth Hoyt
Publisher’s
Description:
The one thing a lady must never do…
Wealthy Gerogina
Maitland doesn’t want a husband, though she could use a good steward to run her
estates. One look at Harry Pye, and
Georgina knows she is not just dealing with a servant, but a man.
Is fall in love…
Harry has known many
aristocrats – including one particular nobleman who is his sworn enemy. But Harry has never met a beautiful lady so independent,
uninhibited, and eager to be in his arms.
With her servant.
Still, it is impossible to conduct a discreet
liaison when dead sheep, murdered villagers, and an enraged magistrate have the
county in an uproar. The locals blame
Harry for everything. Soon it’s all
Georgina can do to keep her head above water and Harry’s out of the noose,
without missing another night of love.
Ratings:
(1=unacceptable, 2=poor, 3=acceptable, 4=good,
5=excellent)
Continuity/Flow – 3
There is some inconsistency as to the
intentions of the hero and heroine. They
can’t seem to make up their minds as to whether or not they trust each other. One minute their actions prove that the trust
is there, but the next minute they are torn apart by indecision. This can be frustrating and distracting.
Sex – 4
While the scenes are risqué, there is a stamp
of class and overlying sensuality that rescues it from being tasteless. The story moves both with and without them,
so they are well placed.
Language – 3
You will find some harsh language in the pub
and fight scenes, but they are not out of place. None of the characters sport particularly
vulgar personalities, so foul language pops up, but is quickly forgotten.
Storyline – 5
I loved this story. There is mystery, sensuality, a smart back
and forth between many of the characters, and a real concern that people can
relate to overall. I enjoyed the fairy
tale (though not as much as the Raven Prince), and I particularly liked how
this time Ms. Hoyt had the heroine telling the story, as opposed to simply
reading it.
Historical Accuracy – 4
While not much is mentioned about the time
period the date provided shows us it is the end of the Georgian period,
transitioning into the Regency Period.
This was a time of great political concern because the French Revolution
had just occurred and the English were very much worried about whether their commoners
would rise up against them. The public
attitude toward Harry (as a commoner) was accurate, but the attitude toward
Bennet, a known bastard who was favored by his father over the heir, was not. He would not have been accepted in society,
no matter how much Lord Granville bullied and blustered.
Overall – 4
This book was well written, and
enjoyable. I admit to being frustrated
by my lack of empathy toward the hero and heroine, but this should not take
away from the overall merits of the book.
Rant:
My issue with this book comes down to how many times the
characters bull-headedly proved they didn't trust each other, despite having no
reason not to. Harry trusts George
enough to protect her, but not enough to believe she loves him. George trusts Harry enough to not believe the
rumors about him (despite some pretty damning evidence), but not enough to
believe he won't abandon her. It's one
of those things that make you want to tear your hair out. Because of this I had a hard time really
bonding with the hero and heroine, and, let's face it, for a book to be well
received that needs to happen.
Rave:
The mystery
of who is killing the sheep is stellar. There
are so many people you want to believe it could be. In the end the person who did it was moot,
because the real villain was just so horrendous all of you hate and venom was
used up praying for something awful to happen to him…which it does!
No comments:
Post a Comment